...using documents, images, maps and online tools
Social studies is a big and sometimes unwieldy subject. Given with the massive body of content in the field and differentiation among pedagogical approaches, social studies educators have the space to be creative and expressive. There are certainly some agreed upon aims in social studies. In fact, there is something approaching consensus that social studies should aim to prepare young people for citizenship. But, what that process entails is a point of considerable disagreement. In a course on Contemporary Issues in Social Studies at NC State, students explored 11 contemporary approaches to learning and teaching social studies. Below are a series of articles reporting of these students' views of contemporary social studies. Tags:
Views: 157
Permalink Reply by Taylor Blanton on December 6, 2010 at 6:22pm
Permalink Reply by Cristina Fishbane on December 6, 2010 at 6:30pm
Permalink Reply by Sarah Roberts on December 6, 2010 at 11:51pm
Permalink Reply by Candice Gilliland Brewer on December 7, 2010 at 8:45am
Permalink Reply by Palmer Bowman on December 7, 2010 at 1:12pm
Permalink Reply by Sarah Kate Bartel on December 7, 2010 at 2:13pm
Permalink Reply by Tyler Anderson on December 7, 2010 at 2:43pm
Permalink Reply by Lauren Ellott on December 7, 2010 at 5:03pm
Permalink Reply by Erin on December 9, 2010 at 7:09pm One of the criticisms of social studies teaching is that it has failed to change with the times; that teachers continue to teach it the same way they did 20 years ago. However, ECI 525, Contemporary Approaches in the Teaching of Social Studies aims to combat this problem. After taking this course, Christopher Dague reflected on what he learned and what he will take back into his classroom. To start with, Mr. Dague parsed out the difference between traditional social studies methodologies and a contemporary approach. In his view, the contemporary approach was not a replacement of the traditional way of teaching but more of a revamp of the “old school” approach – one in which previously peripheral capabilities are used to teach central content. Chalkboards and transparencies, which represented the traditional approach to Mr. Dague, are combined with a variety of other platforms to communicate more information in a more meaningful way. Because these activities engage more students, they may be more successful.
There were a number of activities that Mr. Dague would take back to his classroom. He did allow that he is a European specialist, specifically in French history, but found that a number of the ideas behind the American history assignments translated to his content area. Specifically, he found the video-making activity with James Madison and Federalist Paper #10 to be something he thought would captivate his students and encourage them to think more deeply about the material. He also thought the process of taking an idea and running with it, as in our Plantation Letters document analysis project, was something his students could really benefit from. In both of these assignments, Mr. Dague appreciated that technology could be utilized to allow students to really show what they know because they were performing in platforms with which most of them are very familiar. All of this said, Mr. Dague thought his best work of the semester was on the Narrative Map History assignment. On that assignment the pieces just seemed to fall together and, although he felt the narrative was a bit rushed, he was most happy with the result. I think it is telling when a student prepares work that he is actually happy with and proud of.
However, there were some constraints Mr. Dague felt were necessary to consider when trying to implement a more contemporary approach in his social studies classroom. First, we used a lot of technology in this course and technology always presents certain issues, especially in public schools. Budget constraints limit the technology type and date within the schools and teachers must be careful when assigning technology based assignments to do at home that they are not exacerbating differences in students’ economic backgrounds. To assign these projects, one must first make sure one has access to the resources capable of facilitating the creation these projects. In addition, Mr. Dague was aware utilizing a contemporary approach is not necessarily an effective accommodation tool on its own and that attention will need to be paid to students who might need the lessons and assignments to be modified. Although he recognized these constraints, Mr. Dague was confident that he would still be able to implement many of the ideas we learned about this semester in his classroom.
Permalink Reply by Shawn Gumbleton on December 10, 2010 at 2:28pm
After interviewing Clayton Traver, I was struck by his ability to integrate the various exercises we accomplished during this course into his future pedagogical strategies. I will not discuss Mr. Traver's responses to all of what we've done this semester due to interests of space, but one stands out: his insightful critical approach to Benjamin West's painting of the peace talks between William Penn's Quakers and Native Americans at their settlement in Pennsylvania. Traver criticized West when criticism was due, but was tolerant of West's mistakes and did not overly dwell upon them. Instead he chose to also discuss what was good about West's portrait, a very important part of pedagogical practice. His words on the subject are here: http://newlitcollaborative.ning.com/forum/topics/the-literacy-of-hi....
Too often, we who teach social studies overly dwell upon the sins of the past. While it is important to teach our students about our past mistakes as a nation and as a world, we should also put historical actors' lives and deeds into the proper context of their times.
Traver agrees, stating that "We blame Abraham Lincoln for not living up to the Emancipation Proclamation, and for his speech in the Lincoln-Douglas debate too. We need to understand though, that he was a politician and there were some things he couldn't say out loud. It's impossible for us to have a clear knowledge of the things he thought 150 years ago." He greatly enjoyed getting into the mind of the Lincoln administration through our use of the telegrams sent during the American Civil War, and said he would likely use similar materials when he teaches it to his students. Traver also enjoyed using, creating, and discussing what we called "Beautiful Social Studies," a term to describe the performative and creative aspects of graphs and charts which attract attention and communicate information in unique new ways. His words on this subject are here: http://teachingdigitalhistory.ning.com/forum/topics/visualization-i....
While the specific exercises we performed during this course will vary in their relevance by the subjects we teach in the future, Traver and I both feel that they, and the methodologies they taught us, have improved our repertoire, or "bag of tricks," of ways to excite students about social studies.
Permalink Reply by Christopher Thomas Dague on December 10, 2010 at 3:23pm
ECI 525 was a course for which I had certain preconceived expectations. Coming in to the course, I was under the impression that the course would primarily focus its attention more on the praxis of teaching the various disciplines within the very nebulous confines of what social studies. The class did address, on occasion, pedagogical philosophy and practical application; however, it did it in such a manner that it reached far beyond the constraints of curriculum building and development as well as the standard course of study as prescribed by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.
For this closing assignment, we had the opportunity to reflect on the class not from our perspective alone but also from the perspective of those that were with us throughout the semester. The notion of perception being reality and viewing ideas, events, and topics from almost kaleidoscopic lenses has been a perpetual underpinning of this course throughout. Thus, it was only appropriate that we cyclically finished in relatively the same place we started.
I had the fortune of working and collaborating with Erin Klein and Dustin Adams. Erin has been in the classroom for several years while Dustin is a pre-service teacher. Being interested in how schools of education can further and better aid in the development of pre-service teachers, I was quite interested by Dustin's responses and thus I directed my questions to him as we worked in our three-person group. He, like myself, really enjoyed the assignment concerning Wikipedia as a source of communal knowledge. Wikipedia has become almost ubiquitous in its access and its controversy. Dustin and I certainly agreed that it was certainly interesting to literally write a historical narrative that could be used by millions; it certainly provided me with a different perspective on the entity and its uses.
I followed up by asking him about what he thought was his best work and he believed it was the assignment concerning the map narrative (http://teachingdigitalhistory.ning.com/forum/topics/narrative-map-h...). The map narrative opened up my eyes to just how poorly I have treated the use of maps over my first five years in the classroom. Maps, to me, have been a vehicle for providing superfluous and rote information. I even saw the narrative that could be written with my choice of Galileo’s celestial map. The use of that map and the analysis I did on that map opened my mind to new activities that will even further engage my AP Euro students.
I believe the one aspect of the class that we all agreed upon was the differentiation of technology. Dustin and I proclaimed our respective technological shortcomings and felt that this class allowed us to develop a new understanding of various technological mediums.
Permalink Reply by Madeline Coven on December 10, 2010 at 4:14pm Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000167 EndHTML:0000003236 StartFragment:0000000457 EndFragment:0000003220
Dana St. Juliana, although social studies was not her first interest, finds Raleigh local history important for entertaining visitors, having grown up in Indiana. Students can be keepers of the rich Raleigh history.
Thus, she favored the project in which we narrated the historical map. For this, she chose the first Raleigh map. She learned why Raleigh is the North Carolina capitol, and what it was like at its founding, compared with contemporary Raleigh. She wants to learn tools like Google Map overlays. For her, the implications of modern mapping techniques like these in the classroom are these: while she is excited to use them, she says she would get overboard to want to do things that are unavailable to her with the tools and technical knowledge she has. The following URL is the link to her project: http://teachingdigitalhistory.ning.com/forum/topics/narrative-map-h....
The hardest for Dana was visual analysis, since she was bad at art history. She sees, however, that visual analysis lends itself well to the middle school classroom, since middle school kids need it in their highly visual world to engage them with history. She herself liked assignments that were more open-ended and not constricting. However, she enjoys structure, since she can get lost in ideas and creativity can only come as an enhancement of the kind of loose structure she needs. The map narrative, for example, required in depth expertise and ability to explain the concepts behind the map, and the same is true in narrative pictures that can give artistic perspective to a time period.
Dana believes that social studies should try to engage students and their abstract skills; it is a harder path than rote memorization, but students will feel more fulfilled if they work at it. She anticipates balancing her desired classroom activities with what principal deems suitable.
This community is focused on ideas and resources for teaching using digital historical resources.
© 2012 Created by John Lee.
Powered by
.